User Panel
Originally Posted By StealthM8:
Better snip of Kasich Freudian slip today on noname https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S53-2LYUefQ View Quote |
|
“However improbable these contingencies may seem today, facing them unprepared is a mistake a free people get to make only once.”
Judge Alex Kozinski |
What a time to be alive and woke.
|
|
They call us "civilized" because we're easy to sneak up on.
One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision. |
Originally Posted By chadjetlag:
Holy sheeeit View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By chadjetlag:
Originally Posted By StealthM8:
Better snip of Kasich Freudian slip today on noname https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S53-2LYUefQ |
|
|
Originally Posted By XIIITRAUMA:
https://imgoat.com/uploads/974ce5ac66/102696.jpg View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By XIIITRAUMA:
Originally Posted By chadjetlag:
Originally Posted By StealthM8:
Better snip of Kasich Freudian slip today on noname https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S53-2LYUefQ |
|
“However improbable these contingencies may seem today, facing them unprepared is a mistake a free people get to make only once.”
Judge Alex Kozinski |
Originally Posted By tirod: It doesn't mention drones, it's a simple textbook explanation stating there are two bodies of law. But, lets run with it If you see John Podesta dragging a screaming child you know he shouldn't have, into the back of an old white van, would you question it and intercede? The law says you should and can even prosecute you for failing to do it. If you see Beau Bergdahl holding an AK advancing on your LP in the midst of a firefight holding up the weapon and shooting it, can you shoot him? Law says yes, and a court martial can prosecute you for failing to do it. Change Podesta for some guy wearing priestly robes. Change Bergdahl to Obama. Same rules. We've been conditioned since the murder of Kitty Genovese (1964) to ignore crime done right before our eyes - and now the derpstate is trying to amplify that by telling you that you don't have the "authority" to intercede because the people don't have the powers of the Police. Nope, we don't - we have MORE. Police have powers derived from our rights, not above our rights, although that hasn't been the current practice. We have forgotten how to play. We need to wake up. An officer in command of his troops has the authority to shoot if that soldier is refusing to take orders and perform in a lawful manner. Exigent circumstances - boom. Done. Now, MOVE OUT. We aren't used to that kind of oversight, or, are we? You can get fired just as quickly, and if their were MP's present it would be the better solution but the reality is that someone who's actions constitute a direct act of supporting the enemy are no longer under the protection of the Constitution. Had another soldier seen Bergdahl wandering off, and commanded him to return, his failure could then be the trigger to shoot him on the spot. Most who read this will object and most have never served. Most have not studied the Law of Land Warfare, most were not an officer, most were not an MP, most don't know squat on the subject except for the misinformation constantly propagated by our enemies to deny and distort what is plain fact. Uncomfortable, yes. Does it happen, fortunately, it's rare. Why? The punishment tends to prevent the crime. What in the name of Holy God has prevented the Deep State Cabal in the last eight years? How many arrested for child trafficking? How many executives retired after an EO which siezes the property of child traffickers was signed? How many walked away from politics or were ousted. How many John McCain's executed? Hopefully, few. Potentially, thousands. You have to ask why the photos and posts of people who found FEMA's cache of tens of thousands of coffins and guillotines gets attacked less than this legal fact of military authority. Mention that someone can be tried by military tribunal and the excuses to limit it to military only are stacked high and deep - go read the language yourself and discover no such limits exist. It was deliberately incorporated by wise founders who understood how the people can be manipulated and governments made corrupt. What is the average number of sealed indictments per year historically? About 1,100 a year. Year after year. What is the current number? Over 51,000, with 4,000 already unsealed. How many indictments does it take to point out the DOJ is doing it's job nationwide, but that something is not right and there is a blockade of justice being structured by people in high places? The biggest obstacle? YOU. And me. We just didn't believe that things were this bad. Mostly because we were NOT getting the facts delivered to us on our front lawn in the form of a newspaper. What we got didn't resemble that, it looked more like what the neighbor's dogs were leaving in their nocturnal wanderings. We were being deceived, just as we are now by the same media cooking up distractions and twisting the facts. Some like to point to a consensus of opinion as being an echo chamber and tell us we are gravely mistaken and endanger the Constitution with our distorted views. Well, not this time. Grassley and Kavanaugh covered it with open questions and answers, in public. It's what I was taught in approved lesson plans signed off by senior commanders, and it's settled law. You can shoot a traitor. And if exigent in the circumstances, save the Nation the costs of a trial. Or you can let Skippy drag another innocent into the van and watch him drive off. God help you when his parents rush up asking why you didn't stop him. We are all being called to account for allowing this to go on. If only for the sake of the children, see something, say something. View Quote |
|
Originally Posted By HermanSnerd:
In reality, those two hot chicks that you just met that want you to come home with them for "a good time", are merely the bait for the huge guy hiding in the closet wearing a Batman suit. |
Originally Posted By BM1455:
View Quote |
|
|
That’s one hell of a stage they are setting.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By superA: Right. And if Q's plan falls apart what then? Many have already said this is the last resort and that suspension of the constitution may need to be suspended to accomplish justice (heads on spikes). Whereas in the past I believe suspension of the constitution would have been met with great resistance, now it's an acceptable part of the plan. Why? Because it's "our" plan. View Quote There was an exchange at Kavanaugh's confirmation hearing yesterday (9/5) where Lindsey Graham and Kavanaugh affirmed the longstanding legal precedent of trying American citizens/civilians by military tribunal and executing them if they have taken up against the US government/committed treason. For those saying that could not happen, it already has, and it became a matter of record in the Supreme Court hearing. And Q also mentioned it in one of his most recent drops. Once you start paying attention, it's hard NOT to see the pieces being put in place. |
|
NWRA - NYSRPA - GOA - NRA Life Member - SAF Life Member
|
Originally Posted By exponentialpi:
“Maybe declassification” He is taunting them. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By exponentialpi:
Originally Posted By BM1455:
He is taunting them. |
|
|
They will treat the GWOT the same way they have treated The War On Drugs They will squeeze every dime from the taxpayer to grow their agencies and gain more power by robbing our Freedoms.
. |
They will treat the GWOT the same way they have treated The War On Drugs They will squeeze every dime from the taxpayer to grow their agencies and gain more power by robbing our Freedoms.
. |
Originally Posted By fudimo1:
I've often thought the same on Stormy. Yes great movie. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Life's battles don't always go to the stronger or faster man. In the end, the one who wins is the one who thinks he can! - SCI, NRA
Team Ranstad |
The Stormy part is great. It pushed all the buttons to give the MSM something to focus on. Then the deeper you dig the more it looks like it was a setup to introduce evidence about swamp things.
|
|
They call us "civilized" because we're easy to sneak up on.
One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision. |
No
|
Originally Posted By dmnoid77:
That is a very vibrant fantasy. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By dmnoid77:
Originally Posted By tirod: It doesn't mention drones, it's a simple textbook explanation stating there are two bodies of law. But, lets run with it If you see John Podesta dragging a screaming child you know he shouldn't have, into the back of an old white van, would you question it and intercede? The law says you should and can even prosecute you for failing to do it. If you see Beau Bergdahl holding an AK advancing on your LP in the midst of a firefight holding up the weapon and shooting it, can you shoot him? Law says yes, and a court martial can prosecute you for failing to do it. Change Podesta for some guy wearing priestly robes. Change Bergdahl to Obama. Same rules. We've been conditioned since the murder of Kitty Genovese (1964) to ignore crime done right before our eyes - and now the derpstate is trying to amplify that by telling you that you don't have the "authority" to intercede because the people don't have the powers of the Police. Nope, we don't - we have MORE. Police have powers derived from our rights, not above our rights, although that hasn't been the current practice. We have forgotten how to play. We need to wake up. An officer in command of his troops has the authority to shoot if that soldier is refusing to take orders and perform in a lawful manner. Exigent circumstances - boom. Done. Now, MOVE OUT. We aren't used to that kind of oversight, or, are we? You can get fired just as quickly, and if their were MP's present it would be the better solution but the reality is that someone who's actions constitute a direct act of supporting the enemy are no longer under the protection of the Constitution. Had another soldier seen Bergdahl wandering off, and commanded him to return, his failure could then be the trigger to shoot him on the spot. Most who read this will object and most have never served. Most have not studied the Law of Land Warfare, most were not an officer, most were not an MP, most don't know squat on the subject except for the misinformation constantly propagated by our enemies to deny and distort what is plain fact. Uncomfortable, yes. Does it happen, fortunately, it's rare. Why? The punishment tends to prevent the crime. What in the name of Holy God has prevented the Deep State Cabal in the last eight years? How many arrested for child trafficking? How many executives retired after an EO which siezes the property of child traffickers was signed? How many walked away from politics or were ousted. How many John McCain's executed? Hopefully, few. Potentially, thousands. You have to ask why the photos and posts of people who found FEMA's cache of tens of thousands of coffins and guillotines gets attacked less than this legal fact of military authority. Mention that someone can be tried by military tribunal and the excuses to limit it to military only are stacked high and deep - go read the language yourself and discover no such limits exist. It was deliberately incorporated by wise founders who understood how the people can be manipulated and governments made corrupt. What is the average number of sealed indictments per year historically? About 1,100 a year. Year after year. What is the current number? Over 51,000, with 4,000 already unsealed. How many indictments does it take to point out the DOJ is doing it's job nationwide, but that something is not right and there is a blockade of justice being structured by people in high places? The biggest obstacle? YOU. And me. We just didn't believe that things were this bad. Mostly because we were NOT getting the facts delivered to us on our front lawn in the form of a newspaper. What we got didn't resemble that, it looked more like what the neighbor's dogs were leaving in their nocturnal wanderings. We were being deceived, just as we are now by the same media cooking up distractions and twisting the facts. Some like to point to a consensus of opinion as being an echo chamber and tell us we are gravely mistaken and endanger the Constitution with our distorted views. Well, not this time. Grassley and Kavanaugh covered it with open questions and answers, in public. It's what I was taught in approved lesson plans signed off by senior commanders, and it's settled law. You can shoot a traitor. And if exigent in the circumstances, save the Nation the costs of a trial. Or you can let Skippy drag another innocent into the van and watch him drive off. God help you when his parents rush up asking why you didn't stop him. We are all being called to account for allowing this to go on. If only for the sake of the children, see something, say something. |
|
|
Originally Posted By daa9mm:
No more of a fantasy that JFK and Bill Clinton were great husbands and family men sold to the public by the MSM during their election campaigns. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By daa9mm:
Originally Posted By dmnoid77:
Originally Posted By tirod: It doesn't mention drones, it's a simple textbook explanation stating there are two bodies of law. But, lets run with it If you see John Podesta dragging a screaming child you know he shouldn't have, into the back of an old white van, would you question it and intercede? The law says you should and can even prosecute you for failing to do it. If you see Beau Bergdahl holding an AK advancing on your LP in the midst of a firefight holding up the weapon and shooting it, can you shoot him? Law says yes, and a court martial can prosecute you for failing to do it. Change Podesta for some guy wearing priestly robes. Change Bergdahl to Obama. Same rules. We've been conditioned since the murder of Kitty Genovese (1964) to ignore crime done right before our eyes - and now the derpstate is trying to amplify that by telling you that you don't have the "authority" to intercede because the people don't have the powers of the Police. Nope, we don't - we have MORE. Police have powers derived from our rights, not above our rights, although that hasn't been the current practice. We have forgotten how to play. We need to wake up. An officer in command of his troops has the authority to shoot if that soldier is refusing to take orders and perform in a lawful manner. Exigent circumstances - boom. Done. Now, MOVE OUT. We aren't used to that kind of oversight, or, are we? You can get fired just as quickly, and if their were MP's present it would be the better solution but the reality is that someone who's actions constitute a direct act of supporting the enemy are no longer under the protection of the Constitution. Had another soldier seen Bergdahl wandering off, and commanded him to return, his failure could then be the trigger to shoot him on the spot. Most who read this will object and most have never served. Most have not studied the Law of Land Warfare, most were not an officer, most were not an MP, most don't know squat on the subject except for the misinformation constantly propagated by our enemies to deny and distort what is plain fact. Uncomfortable, yes. Does it happen, fortunately, it's rare. Why? The punishment tends to prevent the crime. What in the name of Holy God has prevented the Deep State Cabal in the last eight years? How many arrested for child trafficking? How many executives retired after an EO which siezes the property of child traffickers was signed? How many walked away from politics or were ousted. How many John McCain's executed? Hopefully, few. Potentially, thousands. You have to ask why the photos and posts of people who found FEMA's cache of tens of thousands of coffins and guillotines gets attacked less than this legal fact of military authority. Mention that someone can be tried by military tribunal and the excuses to limit it to military only are stacked high and deep - go read the language yourself and discover no such limits exist. It was deliberately incorporated by wise founders who understood how the people can be manipulated and governments made corrupt. What is the average number of sealed indictments per year historically? About 1,100 a year. Year after year. What is the current number? Over 51,000, with 4,000 already unsealed. How many indictments does it take to point out the DOJ is doing it's job nationwide, but that something is not right and there is a blockade of justice being structured by people in high places? The biggest obstacle? YOU. And me. We just didn't believe that things were this bad. Mostly because we were NOT getting the facts delivered to us on our front lawn in the form of a newspaper. What we got didn't resemble that, it looked more like what the neighbor's dogs were leaving in their nocturnal wanderings. We were being deceived, just as we are now by the same media cooking up distractions and twisting the facts. Some like to point to a consensus of opinion as being an echo chamber and tell us we are gravely mistaken and endanger the Constitution with our distorted views. Well, not this time. Grassley and Kavanaugh covered it with open questions and answers, in public. It's what I was taught in approved lesson plans signed off by senior commanders, and it's settled law. You can shoot a traitor. And if exigent in the circumstances, save the Nation the costs of a trial. Or you can let Skippy drag another innocent into the van and watch him drive off. God help you when his parents rush up asking why you didn't stop him. We are all being called to account for allowing this to go on. If only for the sake of the children, see something, say something. |
|
Originally Posted By HermanSnerd:
In reality, those two hot chicks that you just met that want you to come home with them for "a good time", are merely the bait for the huge guy hiding in the closet wearing a Batman suit. |
|
Rent never buy......... you don't have to pay for the maintenance and it's easier to upgrade to a newer model.
RIO-lover is on a constant quest for premium trim. :D |
Originally Posted By Lattimer:
Yep. I mean....even her name. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Lattimer:
Originally Posted By Aloxite:
The Stormy part is great. It pushed all the buttons to give the MSM something to focus on. Then the deeper you dig the more it looks like it was a setup to introduce evidence about swamp things. I mean....even her name. MAGA |
|
All your wheel weights are belong to me.
|
Originally Posted By RIO-lover:
Active shooter in Cincinnati https://www.ar15.com/forums/general/Active-shooter-in-Cincinnati-reported/5-2144179/?r=-1&page=1&anc=74357318#i74357318 View Quote Totally not related to it. |
|
|
Exactly this: "My fellow Americans. The Stormy is upon us."
|
|
They call us "civilized" because we're easy to sneak up on.
One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision. |
Anybody else noticed lately that the vapor trails/chemtrails in the sky are gone in their AO? Maybe it's just me but for the past 30 days I've been paying more attention to it, and so has the wife. Neither of us have seen a single vapor trail in at least 30 days
|
|
"It is not the violence that sets a man apart, alright, it is the distance that he is prepared to go."
|
Make a new thread about chemtrails, or this thread will go Alex Jones for 16 pages.
|
|
And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born? Arfbortion 2016 Survivor |
Originally Posted By thesilvercord:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By thesilvercord:
Originally Posted By PFran42:
https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/309598/C7A11573-A5AE-4AEA-A377-BEB1C3E73894-662882.JPG Thanks. |
|
|
Live Free or Die; Death is Not the Worst of Evils
- Revolutionary General John Stark |
Gorsuch - 1
Kavanaugh - 2 |
|
|
Originally Posted By Loki41872:
Make a new thread about chemtrails, or this thread will go Alex Jones for 16 pages. View Quote Would it be better if I called them "Stratospheric Aerosol Injections" like the former CIA director did? Is that a topic that is authorized here? |
|
"It is not the violence that sets a man apart, alright, it is the distance that he is prepared to go."
|
Originally Posted By tirod: It doesn't mention drones, it's a simple textbook explanation stating there are two bodies of law. But, lets run with it If you see John Podesta dragging a screaming child you know he shouldn't have, into the back of an old white van, would you question it and intercede? The law says you should and can even prosecute you for failing to do it. If you see Beau Bergdahl holding an AK advancing on your LP in the midst of a firefight holding up the weapon and shooting it, can you shoot him? Law says yes, and a court martial can prosecute you for failing to do it. Change Podesta for some guy wearing priestly robes. Change Bergdahl to Obama. Same rules. We've been conditioned since the murder of Kitty Genovese (1964) to ignore crime done right before our eyes - and now the derpstate is trying to amplify that by telling you that you don't have the "authority" to intercede because the people don't have the powers of the Police. Nope, we don't - we have MORE. Police have powers derived from our rights, not above our rights, although that hasn't been the current practice. We have forgotten how to play. We need to wake up. An officer in command of his troops has the authority to shoot if that soldier is refusing to take orders and perform in a lawful manner. Exigent circumstances - boom. Done. Now, MOVE OUT. We aren't used to that kind of oversight, or, are we? You can get fired just as quickly, and if their were MP's present it would be the better solution but the reality is that someone who's actions constitute a direct act of supporting the enemy are no longer under the protection of the Constitution. Had another soldier seen Bergdahl wandering off, and commanded him to return, his failure could then be the trigger to shoot him on the spot. Most who read this will object and most have never served. Most have not studied the Law of Land Warfare, most were not an officer, most were not an MP, most don't know squat on the subject except for the misinformation constantly propagated by our enemies to deny and distort what is plain fact. Uncomfortable, yes. Does it happen, fortunately, it's rare. Why? The punishment tends to prevent the crime. What in the name of Holy God has prevented the Deep State Cabal in the last eight years? How many arrested for child trafficking? How many executives retired after an EO which siezes the property of child traffickers was signed? How many walked away from politics or were ousted. How many John McCain's executed? Hopefully, few. Potentially, thousands. You have to ask why the photos and posts of people who found FEMA's cache of tens of thousands of coffins and guillotines gets attacked less than this legal fact of military authority. Mention that someone can be tried by military tribunal and the excuses to limit it to military only are stacked high and deep - go read the language yourself and discover no such limits exist. It was deliberately incorporated by wise founders who understood how the people can be manipulated and governments made corrupt. What is the average number of sealed indictments per year historically? About 1,100 a year. Year after year. What is the current number? Over 51,000, with 4,000 already unsealed. How many indictments does it take to point out the DOJ is doing it's job nationwide, but that something is not right and there is a blockade of justice being structured by people in high places? The biggest obstacle? YOU. And me. We just didn't believe that things were this bad. Mostly because we were NOT getting the facts delivered to us on our front lawn in the form of a newspaper. What we got didn't resemble that, it looked more like what the neighbor's dogs were leaving in their nocturnal wanderings. We were being deceived, just as we are now by the same media cooking up distractions and twisting the facts. Some like to point to a consensus of opinion as being an echo chamber and tell us we are gravely mistaken and endanger the Constitution with our distorted views. Well, not this time. Grassley and Kavanaugh covered it with open questions and answers, in public. It's what I was taught in approved lesson plans signed off by senior commanders, and it's settled law. You can shoot a traitor. And if exigent in the circumstances, save the Nation the costs of a trial. Or you can let Skippy drag another innocent into the van and watch him drive off. God help you when his parents rush up asking why you didn't stop him. We are all being called to account for allowing this to go on. If only for the sake of the children, see something, say something. View Quote Where are you getting this from? Please identify the specific code section in the United States Code that says that a normal citizen failing to intervene in a kidnapping or other crime is breaking the law and subject to criminal punishment. Or the section of the UCMJ stating that if a soldier had seen Bergdal wondering off and told him to return and Bergdal didn't comply, the soldier has the authority to shoot Bergdal on the spot. Or the section of the UCMJ that authorizes a commander to act unilaterally to summarily execute a soldier for failure to follow orders? I am aware that there are some differences in a time of war or authorized military conflict, but how would it apply in the context of this thread? Everyone keeps stating that we are at "war" with the cabal, but there is no actual formal declaration of conflict and there is not even agreement on the identity of the cabal. I also don't get the tie to Obama. You say substitute Obama for Bergdal, which would make the statement that if Obama was advancing on your LP with an AK firing, you have a duty to act. Obviously, the chances of Obama advancing on someone firing an AK is close to statistically impossible, so are you trying to say that if someone feels that Obama was committing a crime, the person is/was legally obligated to intercede and would have been legally justified in using force in so doing? Essentially, it sounds like you are endorsing vigilante justice, up to and including the possibility of an average citizen executing someone that they believe to be a traitor. The other alternative explanation that I was able to come up with is that it sounds like you are suggesting that, even if an average citizen does not have this authority, a member of the military would have this authority. In addition to the question of the statutory basis for this authority, how would a soldier have any authority to act against Obama when he was the commander in chief? I have never actually served in the military, so I may have some of the procedural aspects of this incorrect. |
|
|
Slow-mo video of HA, LG, JM and JK at funeral last week.
ODDITY: Gen. Mattis and Gen. Kelly Eye Lindsey Graham and Huma Abedine |
|
|
The stormy thing and the NY times resistance anon both bring me back to the John Miller thing that happened in the primaries....
https://youtu.be/a7GKGbXVh_A |
|
|
Very Interesting part in bold.
For the folks that can't do ytube here is the transcript of Lindsay Grahm questioning Kavanaugh. From the Chan. Excerpt from Lindsay Graham questioning of Judge Brett Kavanaugh at confirmation hearing, 9/5/2018.
Q: So when somebody says post 9/11 and that we've been at war and it's called the war on terrorism, do you generally agree with that concept? A: I do, Senator, because Congress passed the authorization for use of military force which is still in effect and that was passed of course on September 14 2001 three days later. Q: Let's talk about the law of war. Is there a body of law called the law of armed conflict? A: There is such a body, Senator. Q: Is there a body of law that's called basic criminal law? A: Yes, sir. Q: Are there differences between those two bodies of law? A: Yes, senator. Q: From an American citizen's point of view, do your constitutional rights follow you if you're in Paris (unintelligible) A: (unintelligible) Yes Q: Okay, so if you're in Afghanistan, do your constitutional rights protect you against your own government? A: If you're an American in Afghanistan, you have constitutional rights as against the US government, sir– long-standing, that's long-settled– all in there also long-settled law that– and it goes back to the Eisentrager case. Q: I can't remember the name of it – Johnson v. Eisentrager? A: Right, that American citizens who collaborate with the enemy have [been] considered enemy combatants. They can be– they can be– they're sometimes criminally prosecuted, sometimes treated in the military. Q: Let's talk about can be– I think the under Supreme Court precedent right for them again there's a Supreme Court decision that said that American citizens who collaborated with Nazi saboteurs were tried by the military; is that correct? A: That is correct. Q: I think a couple of were executed? A: Yeah. Q: So if anybody doubts there's a long-standing history in this country that your constitutional rights follow you wherever you go, but you don't have a constitutional right to turn on your own government and collaborate with the enemy of the nation, you'll be treated differently? What's the name of the case, if you can recall, that reaffirmed the concept that you could hold one of our own as an enemy combatant if there were engaged in terrorist activities in Afghanistan? Are you familiar with that case? A: Hamdi. Q: Okay. So the bottom line is on every American says you have constitutional rights, but you do not have a constitutional right to collaborate with the enemy? A: There's a body of law, well developed long before 9/11 that understood the difference between basic criminal law and the law of armed conflict. Q: Do you understand those differences? A: I do understand that they're different bodies of law. Of course. Transcriber's note. This is a machine transcription. Anon divided it into Q and A, added punctuation, and fixed the obvious errors (Senator, Sir). Several minor mis-transcriptions were left but the transcript catches the gist. View Quote |
|
However, the adherence and almost slavish devotion to "nothing is going to happen" requires not researching and even ignoring things that are going on right now.-Tirod
|
Originally Posted By POINTMAN380:
Anybody else noticed lately that the vapor trails/chemtrails in the sky are gone in their AO? Maybe it's just me but for the past 30 days I've been paying more attention to it, and so has the wife. Neither of us have seen a single vapor trail in at least 30 days View Quote |
|
We've been making crackers for generations.
Supreme Saltine |
Originally Posted By Cracker-MF: Not vapor/chemtrails but I have noticed what seems like a huge increase in missing persons in my area - specifically preteen and teenage girls (and some boys). This has been touched on in this thread here and there and a few others have noticed increases in missing persons too. View Quote |
|
Live Free or Die; Death is Not the Worst of Evils
- Revolutionary General John Stark |
Originally Posted By BM1455:
View Quote |
|
vidi vici veni
I don't give a fuck. My name is Dave. |
Declassification but not the expected
Cory Booker Says He Is Going To Knowingly Violate The Senate Rules Link to email |
|
|
Originally Posted By StealthM8:
Link to email View Quote |
|
|
Originally Posted By happycynic:
I wonder if their is actually more missing children, of if its just actually being reported now. Cabal was deep into those agencies working to cover it up. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By happycynic:
Originally Posted By Cracker-MF: Not vapor/chemtrails but I have noticed what seems like a huge increase in missing persons in my area - specifically preteen and teenage girls (and some boys). This has been touched on in this thread here and there and a few others have noticed increases in missing persons too. |
|
We've been making crackers for generations.
Supreme Saltine |
Originally Posted By happycynic:
I wonder if their is actually more missing children, of if its just actually being reported now. Cabal was deep into those agencies working to cover it up. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By happycynic:
Originally Posted By Cracker-MF: Not vapor/chemtrails but I have noticed what seems like a huge increase in missing persons in my area - specifically preteen and teenage girls (and some boys). This has been touched on in this thread here and there and a few others have noticed increases in missing persons too. |
|
Originally Posted By HermanSnerd:
In reality, those two hot chicks that you just met that want you to come home with them for "a good time", are merely the bait for the huge guy hiding in the closet wearing a Batman suit. |
Originally Posted By chadjetlag:
Holy sheeeit, that is one hell of a Freudian slip View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By chadjetlag:
Originally Posted By StealthM8:
Better snip of Kasich Freudian slip today on noname https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S53-2LYUefQ |
|
|
There is some chatter/speculation that the Fast & Furious docs that Obama classified are going to be released.
|
|
They will treat the GWOT the same way they have treated The War On Drugs They will squeeze every dime from the taxpayer to grow their agencies and gain more power by robbing our Freedoms.
. |
Originally Posted By POINTMAN380:
Anybody else noticed lately that the vapor trails/chemtrails in the sky are gone in their AO? Maybe it's just me but for the past 30 days I've been paying more attention to it, and so has the wife. Neither of us have seen a single vapor trail in at least 30 days View Quote John Brennon approves https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9kdDkYfaNMQ |
|
|
So Booker and others clearly broke Senate rules and as usual nothing will happen. BS.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Loki41872:
Make a new thread about chemtrails, or this thread will go Alex Jones for 16 pages. View Quote @ 2 weeks ago Cal Berkley released a paper admitting they have been spraying AL chaf and chem into the skys.......... Researchers with the University of California, Berkeley, have published a new study which calls into question the scientific efforts to block sunlight via climate engineering, also known as geoengineering. Geoengineering is the deliberate and large-scale manipulation of the weather and climate using a variety of technologies. One popular form of geoengineering being explored by scientists is known as Solar Radiation Management (SRM), a process which involves spraying aerosols from planes equipped with particulates designed to reflect sunlight in an effort to combat “anthropogenic global warming.” |
|
|
Originally Posted By guntrk:
Far better that we execute 100 "innocent" senior SES executives than risk having one traitor among us..... View Quote |
|
A lot of my time on this planet has been simply for survival. But at the Cola War, I am living. Tweeter
"You chug, and that's all I need to know." NoloContendere / p2tharizo Arfbortion 2016 Survivor |
I need help, but none that you can give....
OH, USA
|
Has knife hands released a statement on his slip?
|
|
Originally Posted By Taboot:
He's right you know. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Taboot:
Originally Posted By BM1455:
|
|
|
Can't talk...gotta shoot.
C.E. "Bud" Anderson. There are two kinds of people: those who say to God, "Thy will be done," and those to whom God says, "All right, then, have it your way." |
Originally Posted By HermanSnerd:
In reality, those two hot chicks that you just met that want you to come home with them for "a good time", are merely the bait for the huge guy hiding in the closet wearing a Batman suit. |
Originally Posted By StealthM8:
Slow-mo video of HA, LG, JM and JK at funeral last week. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKGdLSVYLWQ View Quote |
|
Deep State Timeline - https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cialWWJ907vV3b9HPS2lhEspZh0WoPHqixUuKed_hFI/edit#gid=125747095
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.